AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 390 und AMD Radeon R3 Graphics Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 390
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 67% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 33.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 160.0 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 20x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2560 vs 128
- 33.3x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 5,120 gflops vs 153.6 gflops
- 28.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8876 vs 310
- 8.4x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 94
- 27.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43778 vs 1568
- 36x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 120.267 vs 3.343
- 29.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 106.771
- 31.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.097 vs 0.35
- 14.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 vs 8.234
- 27.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.381 vs 21.88
- 17.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 vs 587
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 750
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1745
- 17.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 vs 587
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 750
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1745
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 18 June 2015 vs 28 January 2015 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 160.0 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 vs 128 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5,120 gflops vs 153.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8876 vs 310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43778 vs 1568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 vs 3.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 vs 106.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 vs 0.35 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 vs 8.234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 vs 21.88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1745 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- 18.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 275 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 390 | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8876 | 310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43778 | 1568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | 3.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | 106.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | 0.35 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | 8.234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | 21.88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 | 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 | 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1745 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 955 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 390 | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Codename | Grenada | Beema |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 18 June 2015 | 28 January 2015 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 312 | 1609 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5,120 gflops | 153.6 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 | 128 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 160.0 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 275 Watt | 15 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6,200 million | 930 million |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 267 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Anzahl der Eyefinity-Displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Länge | 275 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speicher mit hoher Bandbreite (HBM) | ||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 384 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 512 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |