AMD Radeon R9 M280X versus AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M280X and AMD Radeon R7 250X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 56 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Environ 47% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,792 gflops versus 1,216 gflops
| Date de sortie | 5 February 2015 versus 13 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops versus 1,216 gflops |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250X
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 versus 247
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 versus 814
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3713 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 versus 247 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 versus 814 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 637 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 814 | 2269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M280X | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Saturn | Cape Verde |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series |
| Date de sortie | 5 February 2015 | 13 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 664 | 665 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $260.70 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | 1,216 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | 38 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | Not Listed | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M280X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
IntelUHD Graphics 730
