AMD Radeon R9 M380 versus AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M380 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 850 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 48 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 versus 1306
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12640 versus 4746
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 versus 12.759
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 versus 465.631
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 1.576
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 28.839
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 80.418
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 versus 2181
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2855 versus 2014
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 versus 2181
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2855 versus 2014
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 versus 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12640 versus 4746 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 versus 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 versus 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 versus 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 versus 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 versus 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 versus 2014 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 529
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 versus 536
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 versus 536
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 versus 529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 versus 536 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12640 | 4746 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 2014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M380 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Strato | Mars |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 862 | 864 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 1,040 million |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |