AMD Radeon R9 M380 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1,425 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 300x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 versus 2528
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 411
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12703 versus 7979
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 versus 23.168
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 2.141
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 28.29
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 47.404
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 9 October 2012 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 1,425 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 versus 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12703 versus 7979 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 versus 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 versus 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 versus 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 47.404 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 928 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 billion / sec versus 48 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 546.907
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 3688
- 6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 2855
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 3688
- 6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 versus 2855
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec versus 48 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 546.907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 2855 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12703 | 7979 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 47.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Strato | GK106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 9 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 877 | 878 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 928 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Eyefinity | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |