AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 290 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 89.325
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1366.314
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 98.765
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 6300
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 6300
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 5 November 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 89.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1366.314 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 98.765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 6300 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3697 versus 3685 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 947 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 151.5 GTexel / s versus 137.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- 989.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,849 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 versus 34446
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.034 versus 9.511
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 540.645 versus 511.362
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 versus 1674
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 versus 1674
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 947 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 151.5 GTexel / s versus 137.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,849 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 versus 34446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 versus 9.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 versus 511.362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34446 | 102277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 89.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1366.314 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 10.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 98.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 540.645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3697 | 3685 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8313 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ellesmere | Hawaii |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 5 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 482 | 347 |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 4,849 gflops |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Longeur | 275 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 320.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
ATIFireGL V3350
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7650 GS
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
IntelArc A550M
