AMD Radeon RX 480 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 480 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1266 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1664
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 versus 766
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 versus 28498
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 versus 35.714
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 versus 490.688
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3340
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 966 versus 369
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1664 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 versus 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 versus 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 versus 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 versus 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 versus 369 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 675.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,920 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
- Environ 1% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 148 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 8578
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 103.851
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 versus 769.541
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 versus 7.593
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 11172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 11172
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 8578 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 103.851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 versus 769.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 versus 7.593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 11172 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 480 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 480 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $329 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 360 | 371 |
| Prix maintenant | $299.99 | $407.76 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | 28.59 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | 3,920 gflops |
| GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1664 |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | n / a | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pins |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
