AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 10000 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 versus 592
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 versus 119.936
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 versus 1781
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 versus 13 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 10000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 versus 592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 versus 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 versus 119.936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Environ 73% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10616 versus 9104
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 44527
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 2024.814
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 13.328
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 742.778
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 11075
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 11075
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 130 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 versus 9104 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 44527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 2024.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 13.328 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 742.778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 11075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 11075 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9104 | 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 | 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44527 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1032 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 306 | 270 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 22 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |