AMD Radeon RX 560 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090-1175 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200-1275 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60-80 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 versus 17915
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 versus 49.824
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 versus 44.06
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 versus 103.884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 versus 17915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- 1281.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5917 versus 3645
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 versus 489
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 775.281
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 4.602
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 6571
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 6571
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2136 versus 1774
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5917 versus 3645 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 versus 489 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 4.602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 versus 1774 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3645 | 5917 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | 559 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 17915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 | 2136 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 529 | 532 |
| Prix maintenant | $104.99 | $449.99 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | 15.45 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | 3,333 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s | 134 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 560 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
AMDFirePro M6000
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
