AMD Radeon RX 570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 1400x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 3901
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 521
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 versus 11526
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 42.463
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 versus 642.715
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 2.933
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 versus 26.532
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 133.458
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 4843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3329
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 4843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3329
- 7.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 versus 117
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 18 February 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 640 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 versus 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 versus 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 versus 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- 272.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3624
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3624
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3624 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM107 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 405 | 707 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $299.01 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | 15.02 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 1,389 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |