AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 3668.9x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 1400x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 3901
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 521
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 vs 11526
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 42.463
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 642.715
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 2.933
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 26.532
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 133.458
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3329
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3329
• 7.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
• 272.4x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3624
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3624

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6967 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	626 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36107 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.688 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1083.926 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.251 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.029 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	520.089 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9172 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3624 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9172 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3624 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	880 117

Compare specifications (specs)