AMD Radeon RX 570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926-1168 MHz versus 705 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 338 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35449 versus 22732
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 66.419
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 7.89
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 versus 17.882
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 309.857
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 8124
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 versus 2413
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 2226
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 8124
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 versus 2413
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 2226
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 28 May 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz versus 705 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 876 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 338 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 375 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35449 versus 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 versus 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 versus 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 versus 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 2226 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 2x 2880 versus 2048
- 1978.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 5,046 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 versus 6967
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 versus 626
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1261.593 versus 1083.926
- 4.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 versus 3858
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 versus 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 versus 626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 versus 1083.926 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 versus 3858 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 8905 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 639 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35449 | 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1261.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2226 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3858 | 17055 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK110B |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 28 May 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $2,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 402 | 404 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $1,580 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | 6.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 876 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | 705 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2x 5,046 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 375 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 7,080 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 5760 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |