AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 471.1x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35449 vs 22732
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 66.419
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 7.89
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 17.882
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 309.857
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 8124
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 vs 2413
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2226
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 8124
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 vs 2413
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 28 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35449 vs 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2226 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2048
- 1978.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 6967
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 626
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1261.593 vs 1083.926
- 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3858
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 vs 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 vs 626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 vs 1083.926 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 vs 3858 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 8905 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 639 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35449 | 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1261.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2226 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3858 | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK110B |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 28 May 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 402 | 404 |
Price now | $149.99 | $1,580 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | 6.46 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 705 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2x 5,046 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |