AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 705 MHz
  • Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • 471.1x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 375 Watt
  • 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36141 vs 22732
  • Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 66.419
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 7.89
  • 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 17.882
  • Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 309.857
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 8124
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 vs 2413
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2226
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 8124
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 vs 2413
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2226
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 28 May 2014
Core clock speed 926-1168 MHz vs 705 MHz
Boost clock speed 1206-1244 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate 159.23 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 375 Watt
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36141 vs 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 vs 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 vs 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 vs 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 vs 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3624 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3624 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

  • 2.8x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2048
  • 1978.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 6967
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 626
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1261.593 vs 1083.926
  • 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3862
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2x 2880 vs 2048
Floating-point performance 2x 5,046 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8987 vs 6967
PassMark - G2D Mark 656 vs 626
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1261.593 vs 1083.926
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 17055 vs 3862

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6967
8987
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
626
656
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36141
22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
105.688
66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1083.926
1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.251
7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
79.029
17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
520.089
309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9172
8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3624
2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9172
8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3624
2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3862
17055
Name AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G3D Mark 6967 8987
PassMark - G2D Mark 626 656
Geekbench - OpenCL 36141 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3624 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3624 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3862 17055

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Polaris 20 GK110B
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 18 April 2017 28 May 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $169 $2,999
Place in performance rating 396 395
Price now $149.99 $1,580
Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 59.00 6.46

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1206-1244 MHz 876 MHz
Core clock speed 926-1168 MHz 705 MHz
Floating-point performance 5.1 TFLOPs 2x 5,046 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 2x 2880
Pixel fill rate 39.81 GP/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2048
Texture fill rate 159.23 GTexel/s 338 billion / sec
Texture Units 128
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 375 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 5760

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin Two 8-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 672 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA