AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16664 versus 12844
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 769
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77147 versus 64683
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 174.714
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 3924.968
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 17.305
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 175.219
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1226.861
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 versus 13848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3369 versus 3336
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 versus 13848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3369 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 10 July 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16664 versus 12844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77147 versus 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 versus 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 versus 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Environ 26% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 384.0 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16664 | 12844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77147 | 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $1,599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 196 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |