AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

versus

AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
Environ 91% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1000 MHz
Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 350 Watt
2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16664 versus 8137
Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 745
Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77153 versus 53806
Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 141.474
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 3621.344
Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 13.132
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 112.973
Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 799.933
Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 versus 10141
Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 versus 10141

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	7 July 2019 versus 26 April 2016
Vitesse augmenté	1905 MHz versus 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt versus 350 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	16664 versus 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	927 versus 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	77153 versus 53806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	252.601 versus 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3949.565 versus 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	24.769 versus 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	254.777 versus 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1322.129 versus 799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14699 versus 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14699 versus 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 versus 3713

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo

times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 304.8 GT/s
11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3369
11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3369

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 304.8 GT/s
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	38251 versus 3369
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	38251 versus 3369

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

16664

8137

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

745

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

77153

53806

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

252.601

141.474

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3949.565

3621.344

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.769

13.132

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

254.777

112.973

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1322.129

799.933

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14699

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3369

38251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14699

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3369

38251

Nom	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark	16664	8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	927	745
Geekbench - OpenCL	77153	53806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	252.601	141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3949.565	3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	24.769	13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	254.777	112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1322.129	799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14699	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3369	38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14699	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3369	38251
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9486	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Essentiel
Architecture	RDNA	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	Navi 10	Capsaicin
Date de sortie	7 July 2019	26 April 2016
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$400	$1,499
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	148	188
Genre	Desktop	Workstation
Conception		reference
Prix maintenant		$849
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		17.05
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1905 MHz	1000 MHz
Unités de Compute	40	128
Vitesse du noyau	1605 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	19.51 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	9.75 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate	121.9 GP/s
Render output units	64
Stream Processors	2560
Taux de remplissage de la texture	304.8 GT/s	2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Texture Units	160
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	350 Watt
Compte de transistor	10.3 B	8,900 million
Performance á point flottant		2x 8,192 gflops
Processus de fabrication		28 nm
Pipelines		2x 4096
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Connecteurs d’écran		1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity		6
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	600 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin	3x 8-pin
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur		277 mm
Soutien API
DirectX	12	DirectX® 12
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
OpenGL		4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448 GB/s	512 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	2x 4096 Bit
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Vitesse de mémoire		500 MHz
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
Enduro
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore