AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 94% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14497 versus 8164
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 765
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66234 versus 53806
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 141.474
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 3621.344
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 13.132
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 112.973
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 versus 799.933
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 10141
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 10141
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 26 April 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 versus 8164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 versus 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 versus 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 248.4 GT/s
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3366
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3366
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 248.4 GT/s |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3366 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | 8164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | Capsaicin |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $1,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 188 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Conception | reference | |
| Prix maintenant | $849 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | 128 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 8,900 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 277 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
