AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und AMD Radeon Pro Duo Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 73% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Etwa 94% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 180 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 78% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14497 vs 8164
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 765
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66234 vs 53806
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 141.474
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 3621.344
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 13.132
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 112.973
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 799.933
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 vs 10141
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 vs 10141
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 vs 8164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3713 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 9.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 248.4 GT/s
- 11.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3366
- 11.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3366
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 248.4 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3366 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | 8164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Codename | Navi 10 | Capsaicin |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $1,499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 177 | 188 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Jetzt kaufen | $849 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | 128 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 8,900 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 2x 4096 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Eyefinity | ||
Anzahl der Eyefinity-Displays | 6 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 3x 8-pin |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 277 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 500 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |