AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 876
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66240 versus 51484
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 182.11
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 1797.792
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 14.071
- 9.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 26.444
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 versus 3638
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 versus 3344
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 versus 3638
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 versus 3344
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 6809
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 2 November 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 versus 51484 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 versus 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 6809 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1465 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 255.8 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14687 versus 14500
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 11536
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 11536
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1465 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 255.8 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 versus 14500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 11536 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 14687 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 | 51484 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 6809 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 235 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | |
Pipelines | 2432 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |