AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 876
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66240 vs 51484
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 182.11
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1797.792
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 14.071
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 26.444
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3638
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3344
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3638
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3344
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 vs 6809
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 vs 51484 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 vs 6809 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Etwa 10% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1607 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Texturfüllrate: 255.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14687 vs 14500
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 11536
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 11536
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1607 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 255.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 vs 14500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 11536 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 14687 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 | 51484 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 6809 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | Pascal |
Codename | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $350 | $399 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 177 | 235 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $379.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1465 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 248.4 GT/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 180 Watt | 180 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 7,200 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 8,186 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 2432 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8008 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |