AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 869
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 215.219
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 215.219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 14497
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137748 versus 66234
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 209.509
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 3686.851
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 21.941
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1036.448
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 11536
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 11536
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 14497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 versus 66234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 3686.851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 21.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 11536 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 | 137748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $9,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 103 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
