AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1284 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34598 versus 28498
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 versus 105.107
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1225.96
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 8.737
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 35.714
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 490.688
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 369
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 19 September 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 versus 28498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 versus 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 8.737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 490.688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 369 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Environ 1% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 148 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 7657
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 676
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 9258
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 9258
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 9258 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 9640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 28498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 8.737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 490.688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 19 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 358 | 371 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 148 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1664 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |