AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 94.1 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 1152
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 4803
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 532
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 14261
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 37.505
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 864.402
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 3.09
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 40.457
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 84.186
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 6927
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 6927
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 94.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1152 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 6927 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 383.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,378 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3695
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 1005
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 185 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 1659 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $249 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 576 |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $249.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 23.69 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 2,378 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 580 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon RX 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
