AMD Radeon RX 640 versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 640
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1082 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1218 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 150 Watt
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1218 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 38.98 GTexel/s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 512
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3624 versus 1769
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3624 versus 1769
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 2775
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 2775
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 versus 3278
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 versus 3278
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 versus 11683
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 352
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 versus 2142
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 38.98 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 512 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 versus 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 versus 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 versus 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 versus 3278 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 versus 11683 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 versus 2142 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 9172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | 36107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 626 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | 6967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Arctic Islands | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 794 | 405 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1218 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 8 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38.98 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2200 million | 5,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 241 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 640 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
