AMD Radeon Pro W6600 versus AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2200 MHz versus 1825 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2903 MHz versus 2250 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 versus 17213
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 versus 3714
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 versus 3350
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 versus 17213
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 versus 3714
- 12.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz versus 1825 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz versus 2250 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 versus 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 versus 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 325.1 GTexel/s
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1792
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26791 versus 15596
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 versus 983
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 164043 versus 72837
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 270.025
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 20.735
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 135.303
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 1054.582
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 325.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 1792 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26791 versus 15596 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 versus 983 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 164043 versus 72837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 270.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 20.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 135.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 1054.582 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15596 | 26791 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 | 1047 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72837 | 164043 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20957 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 23 | Navi 21 |
Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 76 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 28 | 80 |
Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 325.1 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11060 million | 26800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |