AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1546 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 295 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 3.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14393 versus 8137
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 745
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 53806
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 versus 141.474
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.889 versus 13.132
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 versus 112.973
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 799.933
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 versus 10141
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 versus 10141
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 26 April 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 versus 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 versus 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 versus 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 versus 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 1290.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 8,192 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 versus 2129.009
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3358
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 2129.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 | 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Capsaicin |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | reference |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 26 April 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $1,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 170 | 188 |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | $849 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | 17.05 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 64 | 128 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | 2x 8,192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 8,900 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 279 mm | 277 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR |