AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 3584
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 67670
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 versus 25.833
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1002.573
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 10 March 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 3584 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 67670 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 versus 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- 892.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,340 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 38% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 11 GB versus 8 GB
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 versus 14121
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 791
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 versus 195.478
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 versus 2129.009
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 14.889
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 versus 14744
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 versus 14744
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 versus 1669
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 295 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 11 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 versus 14121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 versus 195.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 versus 2129.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 14.889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 versus 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 versus 14744 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 versus 1669 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14121 | 18598 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 937 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | 67670 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 | 2231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 186 | 219 |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | $826.98 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | 27.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | 11,340 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
| Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 279 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 352 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 11008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
