AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 versus NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 846 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 13.54 GTexel / s
- 42.7x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 192
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- 22.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14393 versus 641
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 441
- 13.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14744 versus 1087
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2012
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3071
- 13.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14744 versus 1087
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2012
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3071
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 846 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 13.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 192 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 versus 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3071 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 25.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 324.9 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- 9.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2400 MHz versus 1890 MHz
| Performance á point flottant | 324.9 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 295 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2400 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 | 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3071 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GK208 |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 170 | 834 |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz | 846 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | 324.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | 13.54 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 1270 Million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Longeur | 279 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
