AMD Radeon Vega 3 versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 3 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 3
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 15x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 225 Watt
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 55.04 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 192
- 4.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,761 gflops versus 384.0 gflops
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3885 versus 889
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 versus 303
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.041 versus 10.049
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 versus 183.156
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 versus 0.75
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 18.933
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 versus 60.006
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6173 versus 1412
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 versus 2111
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3174
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6173 versus 1412
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 versus 2111
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3174
- 3.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1312 versus 418
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.04 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,761 gflops versus 384.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3885 versus 889 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 versus 303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 versus 10.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 versus 183.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 versus 0.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 18.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 60.006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 versus 1412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 2111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 versus 1412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 2111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3174 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 versus 418 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 3885 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 5 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1267 | 520 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 3 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon Vega 3 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX
