AMD Radeon Vega 3 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 3
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 384.0 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 889 versus 623
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 versus 212
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3963 versus 1946
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.049 versus 6.705
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 183.156 versus 100.391
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.75 versus 0.441
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.933 versus 8.146
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 versus 20.64
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 versus 977
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 versus 1494
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 versus 1833
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 versus 977
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 versus 1494
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 versus 1833
- 2.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 versus 192
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 27 March 2014 |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 versus 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 versus 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 versus 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 versus 192 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Owl | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1267 | 1488 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |