AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 5.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 versus 347
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 194
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 versus 8.712
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 176.928 versus 155.638
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 versus 0.931
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 versus 7.36
- 11.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 versus 12.009
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 versus 754
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 versus 1492
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 2392
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 versus 754
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 versus 1492
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 versus 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 versus 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 versus 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 versus 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 versus 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 versus 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 300 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2392 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | 0 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 538 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | Raven | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2018 | 14 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 931 | 1501 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 33.6 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
