AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 347
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 194
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 8.712
Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 176.928 vs 155.638
Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 0.931
3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 7.36
11.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 12.009
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 754
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1492
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2392
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 754
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1492
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2392

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2018 vs 14 May 2012
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894 vs 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	355 vs 194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039 vs 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	176.928 vs 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666 vs 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603 vs 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437 vs 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170 vs 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170 vs 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz

Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1894

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

355

194

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.039

8.712

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

176.928

155.638

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.666

0.931

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.603

7.36

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

135.437

12.009

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2408

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

2392

Name	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	1894	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	355	194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.039	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	176.928	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.666	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.603	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	135.437	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2408	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2408	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	862	0
Geekbench - OpenCL		538

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Generation 7.0
Code name	Raven	Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date	23 April 2018	14 May 2012
Place in performance rating	931	1501
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	1,200 million
Floating-point performance		33.6 gflops
Pipelines		16
Texture fill rate		4.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
Memory
Memory bus width		64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync