AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus AMD FirePro M4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and AMD FirePro M4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8776 versus 5532
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 versus 15.659
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 versus 1.67
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 versus 30.072
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 79.304
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3357
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3357
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 27 June 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 versus 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8776 versus 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 versus 15.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 versus 1.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 versus 30.072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 79.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4000
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 675 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1595 versus 1581
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 424.37 versus 365.4
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2189 versus 1514
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3539 versus 2433
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2189 versus 1514
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3539 versus 2433
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 675 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1595 versus 1581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 424.37 versus 365.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 versus 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 versus 2433 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD FirePro M4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1581 | 1595 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8776 | 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 15.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 424.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 1.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 30.072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 79.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 2189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 2189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD FirePro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Owl | Chelsea |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 27 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 950 | 952 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 675 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-A (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | n / a | |
Facteur de forme | MXM-A | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |