AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus AMD Radeon R7 M370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and AMD Radeon R7 M370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 960 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1579 versus 1418
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8803 versus 7070
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 versus 17.26
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 versus 1.653
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 versus 30.082
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 70.174
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2433 versus 1484
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 2449
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2433 versus 1484
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 2449
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 5 May 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 960 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1579 versus 1418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 versus 7070 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 versus 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 versus 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 versus 30.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 versus 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 versus 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 2449 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 408
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 versus 365.4
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 versus 1514
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 versus 1514
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 versus 365.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 versus 1514 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1579 | 1418 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | 676 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 | 7070 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 17.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 476.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 1.653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 30.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 70.174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 2449 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Owl | Litho |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 932 | 933 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 737.3 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.04 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 73.6 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
