AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus AMD FirePro V4900
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and AMD FirePro V4900 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1584 versus 988
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 versus 309
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 versus 6.303
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 versus 0.597
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 versus 17.874
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 72.818
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 1 November 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 versus 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 versus 309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 versus 6.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 versus 0.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 versus 17.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 72.818 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro V4900
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12641 versus 8804
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 392.237 versus 365.4
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 versus 1514
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 versus 2433
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 versus 6729
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 versus 1514
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 versus 2433
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 versus 6729
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12641 versus 8804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 versus 365.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 versus 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 versus 6729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 versus 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 versus 6729 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD FirePro V4900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 | 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 309 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8804 | 12641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 6.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 392.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 0.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 17.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 72.818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 7745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 7745 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD FirePro V4900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Owl | Turks |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 1 November 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 950 | 947 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 716 million |
Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 163 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |