AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce 945M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 versus 255
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8803 versus 8099
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 versus 1.988
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 versus 31.027
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 versus 107.094
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3343
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3343
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 27 October 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 versus 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 versus 8099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 versus 1.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 versus 31.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 versus 107.094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 versus 1584
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 25.891
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 380.461 versus 365.4
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 versus 1514
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 2433
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 versus 1514
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 2433
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 versus 1584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 25.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 versus 365.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 2433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 2433 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 | 2108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 | 8099 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 28.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 380.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 1.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 31.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 107.094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 2961 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 2961 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Owl | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 27 October 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 950 | 952 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |