AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 25 Watt
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 versus 224
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8763 versus 6135
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2433 versus 1692
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3011
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2433 versus 1692
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3011
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 11 January 2017 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 25 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 versus 224 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8763 versus 6135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 versus 1692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 versus 1692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3011 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1041 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1889 versus 1581
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3079 versus 1514
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3079 versus 1514
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1041 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1889 versus 1581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3079 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3079 versus 1514 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1581 | 1889 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 224 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8763 | 6135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 3079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 1692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 3079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 1692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3011 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Owl | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 11 January 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 957 | 958 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1041 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | |
| Performance á point flottant | 799.5 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.66 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDRadeon 680M
