ATI Radeon HD 5570 versus ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo ATI Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 39 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1370 versus 693
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 versus 3.914
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 versus 184.557
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 versus 0.319
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 versus 27.325
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 versus 1129
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 2113
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 versus 1129
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 2113
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 October 2011 versus 14 January 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt versus 64 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1370 versus 693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 versus 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 versus 184.557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 versus 0.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 versus 27.325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 versus 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 versus 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 2113 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 775 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.5 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 620.0 gflops versus 520.0 gflops
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 versus 478
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 versus 198
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.627 versus 11.345
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 versus 1160
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 versus 1160
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.5 GTexel / s versus 13 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops versus 520.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 versus 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 versus 198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 versus 11.345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 versus 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 versus 1160 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 | 801 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1370 | 693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | 184.557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | 0.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | 12.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | 27.325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 2113 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| ATI Radeon HD 5570 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Turks | Redwood |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 11 October 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1369 | 1427 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 520.0 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 400 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | 627 million |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 165 mm | 168 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer ATI Radeon HD 5570 avec des autres
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 360M
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6630M
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K600
ATIRadeon HD 5570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
