ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 64 Watt
• Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1370 vs 693
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 vs 3.914
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 184.557
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 vs 0.319
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 27.325
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1129
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2113
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1129
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2113

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 15.5 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• Around 19% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 520.0 gflops
• 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 478
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 198
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.627 vs 11.345
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 1160
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 1160

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	478 801
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	198 291
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1370 693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.393 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	235.572 184.557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.454 0.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.345 12.627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.016 27.325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1160 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1883 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 2113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1160 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1883 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 2113

Compare specifications (specs)