Apple M1 8-core versus AMD Radeon HD 7990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Apple M1 8-core and AMD Radeon HD 7990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Apple M1 8-core
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1278 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 5 nm versus 28 nm
- 37.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 2x 3 GB
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10433 versus 6689
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10433 versus 6689
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 versus 24 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1278 MHz versus 950 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2x 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 versus 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 versus 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7990
- 512x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 8
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 8 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Apple M1 8-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Apple M1 8-core | AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18993 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10433 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10433 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 88.665 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1753.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.328 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 434.598 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Apple M1 8-core | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Date de sortie | 10 Nov 2020 | 24 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 420 | 417 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
| Nom de code | Malta | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $1,126.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1278 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5200 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.617 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8 | 2x 2048 |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 66.67 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR4X-4266 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 307 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Apple M1 8-core avec des autres
AppleM1 8-core vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AppleM1 8-core vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AppleM1 8-core vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AppleM1 8-core vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AppleM1 8-core vs
AMDRadeon HD 7990
AppleM1 8-core vs
AppleM1 7-core
