Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 versus 830
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 2902
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 10.872
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.817
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 12.415
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 18 June 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 versus 830 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 209
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 versus 143.083
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 28.182
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 951
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1462
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 951
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1462
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 versus 143.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 28.182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1462 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1311 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |