Intel HD Graphics 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 65% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 403.2 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 versus 623
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 versus 212
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 versus 1946
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 6.705
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 100.391
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 0.441
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 8.146
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 20.64
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 versus 977
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 1833
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 versus 977
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 1833
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 versus 192
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 27 March 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 versus 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 versus 192 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1488 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |