Intel HD Graphics 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 versus 830
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 versus 2902
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 10.872
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 166.832
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 0.817
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 12.415
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3324
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3324
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 18 June 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 versus 327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 72% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 30.177
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1045
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1045
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 30.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1045 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1311 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz |