Intel HD Graphics 615 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 615
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 versus 10.243
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.238 versus 0.966
- 22.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 versus 51
- 24x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1128 versus 47
- 40.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 versus 59.6
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 versus 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 versus 0.966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 versus 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 versus 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 versus 59.6 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- 3.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1085 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 38% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 833.3 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 versus 215.572
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.793 versus 11.311
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.139 versus 18.292
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 versus 1128
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 versus 1128
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 2409
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1085 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 833.3 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 versus 215.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 versus 11.311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.139 versus 18.292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 versus 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 versus 1128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 2409 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 706 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | 393.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | 0.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | 18.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | 19.139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | 2916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 | 59.6 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1483 | 1486 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 833.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 615 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
IntelHD Graphics 615 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5500
