Intel HD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 922 versus 830
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4178 versus 2902
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 versus 10.872
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.879 versus 166.832
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.508 versus 0.817
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.582 versus 12.415
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1733 versus 1693
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1733 versus 1693
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 343 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 18 June 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 versus 830 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 versus 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 versus 327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 72% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 216
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 30.288
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1404
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1404
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 30.288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1404 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 922 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4178 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1334 | 1311 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |