Intel HD Graphics 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 530 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 versus 995
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 254
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 versus 4397
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 versus 19.781
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 versus 30.177
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 versus 1045
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 versus 1045
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 versus 384
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 versus 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 versus 4397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 versus 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 versus 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 versus 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 versus 1045 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 versus 384 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 27.948
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 312.246
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 1.795
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 1945
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 1945
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 27.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 1.795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 995 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 4397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 30.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 330.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 1.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 19.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 30.177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 2393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Skylake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 1248 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
