Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1114 vs 995
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 254
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 vs 4397
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 19.781
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.567 vs 30.177
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 1045
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 1045
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 vs 384

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 27.948
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 312.246
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.795
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1945
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	388 384

Compare specifications (specs)