Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 15.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 30 May 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 27.6 GTexel / s
- 64x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 24
- 7.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 versus 1114
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 versus 268
- 4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18068 versus 4554
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.824 versus 27.948
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 312.246
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 1.795
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.06 versus 20.404
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.884 versus 32.567
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 1859
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 1945
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 1859
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 1945
- 5.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 versus 388
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 versus 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 versus 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 versus 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 versus 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 versus 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 versus 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 1945 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 versus 388 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 5939 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 562 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 18068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 1089.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 4.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 44.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 30 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 515 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1046 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 134 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.3 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |