Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 888 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 32.718
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3325
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3325
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 888 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 32.718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 24x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 48
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 465.116
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 2.796
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 29.115
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 54.932
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 2780
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 1884
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 2780
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 1884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 465.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 29.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 1884 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 22 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1031 | 811 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1536 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4600
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 4200 Go
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9500
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
IntelHD Graphics P630
