Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus Intel HD Graphics P630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Intel HD Graphics P630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1726 versus 1203
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 versus 288
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7343 versus 4924
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 versus 979
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3049
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 versus 979
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3049
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 5 August 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 versus 1203 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 versus 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 versus 4924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 versus 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 versus 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3049 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P630
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2158 versus 1884
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2158 versus 1884
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 versus 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 versus 1884 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Intel HD Graphics P630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 | 1203 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 | 4924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3049 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Intel HD Graphics P630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 5 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1043 | 1044 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
RAM maximale | 1740 MB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |