Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 123.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 16 nm
- 8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 31.946
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3338
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3338
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 18 August 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 123.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 31.946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3338 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 384
- 3.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 versus 2666
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 versus 383
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 versus 11991
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 79.859
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 versus 1137.615
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 versus 4.569
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 versus 192.566
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 5609
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 5609
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 versus 2666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 versus 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 versus 11991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 79.859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 versus 1137.615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 versus 4.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 versus 192.566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 5609 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 9796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 32384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 115.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 8.057 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 31.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 425.709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GP106 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 388 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 250 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |