Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX versus AMD Radeon RX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon RX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 79.20 GTexel/s versus 182.3 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 150 Watt
| Date de sortie | 31 Oct 2020 versus 29 June 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 79.20 GTexel/s versus 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 versus 14238
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 6889
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 6889
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3462
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3462
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3214
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3214
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 versus 311
- 4.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 versus 1972
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 versus 14238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 versus 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 versus 1972 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 39538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 11172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3361 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 774 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 8578 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | DG1 | Ellesmere |
| Date de sortie | 31 Oct 2020 | 29 June 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 523 | 360 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 96 | 36 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1120 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 79.20 GTexel/s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | n / a | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 68.26 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
